From: Zubair Khan < Sent: Friday, Novem er *ft 2016 6:34 AM To: jeffrey E. Subject: Re: Just checked report again. NY is correc=. We only got WI wrong. Regards, Zubair On Fri, 11 Nov 2016 at 10:29 am, jeffrey E. &I=;[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]» wr=te: New York ? How ? =t was hillary no doubt always On Friday, 11 November 2016, Zuba=r Khan > wrote: Out of 13 states we got 11 right. The ones we got wr=ng are NY and WI. In the last report, analyzed data was of 3 days in w=ich Clinton got a positive spike after she got clearance from FBI. However=Trump dominated the social media positively if we analyze one week data be=ore starting time of election, monthly data and entire data which we have =athered for months. Based on this we predicted on our Facebook page on 30t= October that Trump will be next president of US. Our model work= but I think the important question which we failed to answer is that how =uch historic data must be analyzed to make the right decision. This could =ave been answered if we had a Data Scientist. Also I believe its a great t=ol to track voters and get them to vote. It can be used in French election= next year or elections of Brazil in 2018 but unfortunately I have to shut=down this project as getting data from Twitter is expensive and the start =p is running out of money. I am going to focus on cyber security=again and will definitely reach out if I have a powerful investable idea.=C24k Regards, Zubair Khan On=Nov 11, 2016, at 4:49 AM, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: not so good 40=A0 please note EFTA_R1_00107613 EFTA01785457