From: Vincenzo lozzo Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2016 10:11 AM To: Jeffrey E. Subject: Re: DNC docs Actually the better example is: "if we=can shave off a couple of milliseconds when we execute the trade" Bu= yeah, it's a bit moot anyway Sent from my (phone On Jun 16, 2016, at 06:05, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: I dont know of any that woudl o=en their books. also most are probablistic , so an i=crease wouldnt be easily determinative =br> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 5:23 AM, Vincenzo loz=o > wrote: Btw do you know anybody well that does quantitativ= trading/hft? I have been thinking of trying a new type of consulting where=the formula is roughly "I audit your code, i= I find anything that can be optimized I get 10% cut of the extra revenue y=u make thanks to the optimization" Technical=y it's not restricted to hedge funds (eg: this would work equally well for G=ogle and the likes) but the connection between optimized code and increased=revenue is probably clearer for hedge funds, plus they have a lot of custom=zed code so higher chances that they messed up something Sent f=om my Iphone On Jun 15, 2016, at 18:22, jeffre= E. <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]» wrote: fun, but the only important ones would be hillarys =secret O= Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 5:54 PM, Vincenzo lozzo wrote: https://=uccifer2.wordpress.com/2016/06/15/dnc/ <https://guccifer2.=ordpress.com/2016/06/15/dnc/> EFTA_R1_00105734 EFTA01784415