From: David Sauvage < Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 3:57 PM To: Jeffrey E. Subject: Re: I don't mind anything you're saying - l=am definitely not a scientist, don't claim to be, and don't know much about=experiments and design. I feel like it'd be good to talk it out? I s=y what I can do, and somebody who knows science tells me how we can test th=t, until we arrive at a solution that works both ways? Sent fr=m my mobile device On Aug 16, 2016, at 11:44 AM, jeffrey E. &=t;[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> wr=te: I like you= I am trying to be kind, that is not science. . if y=u make people feel better and no one is injured , all the best to you. = how about being blindfolded and guessing their nam=. the outcome must be verifiable, not you are shy ,=sometimes. angry other times . the trick of mentalists th=t do much better than that. they could take a strength finder t=st, and then you could take it with empathy for them, the=e are 100 questions see if you got the more than 80 percent rig=t. On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 9:24 AM, David Sauvage < <nlailtc » wrote: Jeffrey, Just an additional thought. A vi=ion, actually-- What if I did readings blindfolded? So I held=someone's hand and felt into them. With such limited visual/tactile informa=ion, it would be a real test of my empathic abilities. It would almost vali=ate "the sixth sense." Then maybe we could compare=my ability to read people with an average person's ability to read people?&=bsp; Just brainstorming here... Very best, David =div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 9:28 AM, David Sauvage > wrote: I would love to do that. Definitely has highe= probability of success. EFTA_R1_00105725 EFTA01784411