From: David Sauvage mounomplimenew Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 4:49 PM To: Jeffrey E. Subject: Re: That's cool. Question for you: when=l read your lady-friend in the room, did you feel I was tapping into somet=ing real? Or did you feel I was just saying random stuff that would apply =o anyone, like the astrologer? David <=iv class="gmail_extra"> On Tue, Aug 16, 20=6 at 12:44 PM, jeffrey E. <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> wrote= i told them that the a=troler in the room could tell them their diagnosis. they=all received the exact same piece of paper , however they all rated =he astrologer as between good an perfect O= Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 10:39 AM, David Sauvage wrote: I'm confused. You did an experiment with 200 girls where you held the=r hands and rating them? Or that's what you're suggesting for me?<=div> On Tue, Aug =6, 2016 at 12:30 PM, jeffrey E. <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >=wrote: you dont have to=be a scientist to underatnd the concept of proof. =C240 does massage work? not a science question , but some thi=k it does. can you prove to anyone that your intuitive a=ilities are repeatable. verifiable, . probab=y not. but is ok. with vast experience , chinese d=ctors can tell if someones kidneys are working properly , the =yes are a little dull and yellow, its not science but a pretty=good predictor. . the other experiment you can try if yo= want is hold their hands. write down what you feel. 1>=A0 , and afterwards have them choose which best describes thei= charcateristics. I did this with 200 girls. =C24, each one had to rate the accuracy of diagnosisi on a scale of 1-10.=C21, the results ranged from 3-10. 40=A0 however, the written diagnosis was exactly the =ame for each, no one like the results . beliveing is mo=e fun On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 9:57 AM, David Sauvage = a wrote: I don't mind anything you're saying - I am defini=ely not a scientist, don't claim to be, and don't