From: Jeevacation <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 11:59 AM To: Dr. Henry Jarecki Subject: Re: RE: Quality is not a mere matter of opinion \ my point only is that the quality Is simply not there your definition of scholar is so broad -that it includes all teachers - all researches - all people that publish my only real beef is that there are no real standards of excellence -yes they all have need and yes the color of mackerel might be relevant to a small group of people however I would bet that on any measure of quality of originality. Competence insight what I have read so far is hardly in the top 10 percent of anyones necessities Sent from my iPhone On Apr 21, 2009, at 12:28 PM, "Dr. Henry Jarecki" > wrote: Since I am fond of you, I will not comment in an ad hominem way. You believe (erroneously) that scientific knowledge happens in giant bites and high significance and is identifiable from a distance. I believe it happens in small pieces, a bit at a time. I am as we speak, in a scientific advisory board meeting where the bites they are discussing are far smaller than the effect of storage on mackerel, a matter of urgency to farmers, grocers, housewives, economists, all of whom will use it for their benefit and some of whom will use it as further stepping stones to more ideas and studies. From: Jeffrey Epstein (mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> J Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 09 12:20 To: Dr. Henry Jarecki Subject: I guess you did n;t read what was sent.. An example of the world class ( not merely chatty dinner companions ) work. thousands upon thousands of this quality work can be found on the web everday... THis looks worse than the earmarks for Leahys district .1 THe effect of storage on color and texure of mackerel 2.gay and bisexual men in kampala. 3, supression of Tamil women narratives in sri lanka 3.science librarianship in africa 4. book review by alphonse maindo 5. threats and cha