From: Paul Tweed < I Sent: Sunday, May 1, 2011 1:54 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Advices No problem Jeffrey. In order to ensure that we don't end up putting" fuel o= the fire", we have had to be more cautious in our research and advices th=n would normally be the case....thus the higher costs. I've just arrived back in the UK and will revert to you by tomorrow with fu=ther comments on the draft letter. In the meantime I note that Paul Flynn,a labour backbench MP intends this w=ek to challenge historic rules preventing MP's from criticising any member=of the Royal family,with Prince Andrew being his specific target. This may=raise further references to you. Accordingly the DoY's intervention will be all the more important. We may a=so have to consider legal action against the Mail on privacy (and possibly=malicious falsehood) grounds. As the Telegraph are sitting tight without c=mmiting themselves one way or the other, legal proceedings may be the most=effective option. I do however appreciate that you,understandably, are conscious of the risin= costs, but I just wanted to set out the position at this stage. Happy to discuss further as required Jeffrey. Kind regards, Paul. Sent using BlackBerry Paul Tweed Senior Partner Belfast I Dublin I London w: http://www.johnsonslaw.com/ b: http://www.globallibeldebate.com/ London Office: 21 Arlington Street, London, SW1A 1RN Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority Firm SRA ID: 544356 http://www.sra.org.uk/rules Paul Tweed is also a member of Paul Tweed LLP Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority SRA ID: 545975 Disclaimer: This e-mail transmission may be legally privileged but is, in any event, co=fidential and intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If y=u are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute or dissemi=ate the information in it, or take any action in reliance of it. Any views=expressed in this message are those of the in