home

epstein-data
Research ▼
🔍 SearchFull-text document search 🤖 Ask AIAI research assistant 🔎 Evidence MapFBI serial resolution 📷 Reverse Image SearchCLIP + face across 614K images 🧑 Find Face BETASearch 29K faces by photo 💻 Run Your OwnDownload & search locally
Explore ▼
📚 Full Text Corpus1.39M docs, 2.77M pages 🌎 Global Heatmap145 countries mentioned 📈 Coverage MapWhat's here 🌌 AtlasSemantic map · 1.29M docs ⚖ Cases53 federal & state cases · per-case briefings 🎤 DepositionsTranscribed audio & video 💬 Hear from the SurvivorsSurvivors in their own words 📖 Cover to Cover-Up24-hour public reading, synced to the video ✉ Wolff–Epstein Emails2,009 messages · 2009–2019
📷 Images92K analyzed photographs 🔍 Multi-DB SearchSearch all databases individually 🗃 All Databases14 searchable databases
Reports
News ▼
📰 NewsCoverage & reporting ⚖ Justice MonitorArrests, charges, lawsuits, firings
Source ▼
🏛 DOJ ProductionOfficial EFTA disclosures 📜 EFTA Law TextPublic Law 119-38 📁 Source Data (GitHub)Open source databases
🌐 Community ResourcesCurated external projects ✉ ContactGeneral · privacy · DMCA · press
❤️ Donate 🎧 Podcast

Research

🔍 Search Documents 🤖 Ask AI 🔎 Evidence Map 📷 Reverse Image Search 🧑 Find Face BETA 💻 Run Your Own Investigator

Explore

📚 Full Text Corpus 🌎 Global Heatmap 📈 Coverage Map 🌌 Atlas ⚖ Cases 🎤 Depositions 💬 Hear from the Survivors 📖 Cover to Cover-Up ✉ Wolff–Epstein Emails 📷 Images 🔍 Multi-DB Search 🗃 All Databases

Reports

Browse All Reports 📰 News ⚖ Justice Monitor

Source

🏛 DOJ Production 📜 EFTA Law 📁 Source Data (GitHub) 🌐 Community Resources ✉ Contact
🎧 Podcast & Newsletter ❤️ Donate Privacy Policy

EFTA01771775

← Prev Next →
Loading document…

From: William Blum Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 11:22 PM To: Jeffrey E. ([email protected]) Cc: Robert Ladislaw Subject: NIIT provisions Dear Jeff —</=> I wanted to revisit this issue which we talke= about on the phone. As presently drafted, the provision would actua=ly allow the BIR to pursue taxpayers who did not pay this tax for the 2013=through 2015 tax years based on a 6-year statute of limitations instead of=3 years and it also allows a reduced penalty (5%) for those years for taxp=yers who pay before audit — sort of like an amnesty. I expect =hat this would actually be a revenue raiser so the Governor should be happ= with it. Should I leave that in? Also, as presently drafted, VI source dividends and interest=would not be subject to the tax for future years (starting in 2017). =1 think that would have little impact actually since the money maker for t=e Government here is capital gains and that would not be exempted. B=t exempting VI source income and dividends is an incentive (albeit a small=one) to invest in USVI entities and to lend money to VI persons. Sho=ld I leave that in? I am=planning to get another draft out tomorrow, probably by mid-day. Feel free to call if you want to di=cuss. Yours,</=pan> Bill William Blum I Partner SOLOMON BLUM HEYMANN LLP &=bsp; &nbs=; &=bsp; 40 Wall Street, 35th floor New York, NY 10=05 Tel EFTA_R1_00083602 EFTA01771775

Suggest a category
Misclassified? Pick a better fit.
Community Notes
▸ People Mentioned
▸ Interest Level
Routine Notable Significant
▸ Dates Mentioned
▸ Related Topics
▸ Places & Organizations
▸ Transcription Correction
Related documents
Source Data Investigation Reports DOJ EFTA CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 Contact
Independent research project. Not affiliated with the U.S. Department of Justice, FBI, any government agency, or Anthropic. All analytical text on this site is AI-generated (Claude, Anthropic) and iteratively fact-checked against source documents, but may contain errors. Verify all claims against linked EFTA sources before citing.
Powered by Datasette  ·  ❤️ Buy me a coffee

You are leaving epstein-data.com

You are being redirected to an external website not operated by this project. We are not responsible for the content or privacy practices of external sites.

Powered by Datasette