From: Ian Osborne <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, January 4, 2012 12:32 AM To: Jeffrey Epstein Subject: Re: I take your point. Solina gave=me her personal feedback on the 16th but she did not instruct lawyers until=last week — and their comments did not arrive until this morning. I'm not dragging my feet on this — quite the opp=site — I've asked Solina to fast track this but I have limited contro= over her process. Whilst we could have gone ahead without her and Li Ka Sh=ng, I prefer to include them. It underlines the close relationship I have w=th them but they are also one of the most credible investors in this sector=worldwide. F=om: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]» Date: Tu=, 3 Jan 2012 18:16:12 -0500 To: I=n Osborne [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]»<=r>Subject: Fwd: </=iv> Forwarded message - br>From: Ian Osborne <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]» Date: <=pan style="background-color:rgb(255,255,51)">Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 12:10 P</=pan>M Subject: Re: To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]=m» Slaught=r and May docs are just awaiting Solina Chau's comments They are coming over today. All being w=II they can issue the docs on Monday. We have purchase docs from Jawbone, n=t yet Wonga (early Jan) and Spotify (mid Jan). Are=you still here tomorrow morning? We can discuss separate to Tom how to fast=track this thing now — and Jacob can join us. Also following separate discussions with Tom P and Michael, I've broken do=n the agenda for you into distinct phases so you will be more comfortable. =e can discuss either tonight with Tom or separately — whichever you p=efer. From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]» Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 21:16:35 -0500 <=pan style="font-weight:bold">To: Ian Osborne <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]» Subject: Re: EFTA_R1_00082540 EFTA01771161