From: Jeffrey <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, June 5, 2012 3:54 PM To: Craig Martin Subject: Re: If you feel bullied.,,, Sorry for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone On Jun 5, 20=2, at 11:37 AM, Craig Martin wrote: I never reca=l saying that there would be a 20' road. You tried t= bully me this morning to say that. The only discuss=on I recall is that there was to be a road around building. Which there is.=/span> I spoke with Tom and Brice this morning. They do not=recall any conversation on a 20' road. I have do=umented e-mail from Brice that you were copied on that says pad was to be 8='. There is no documentation for a 20' road.<=div> You saw the layout before it was poured. From: Jeffrey <[email protected]> To: Craig Martin Sent: Tuesday, June , : Subject: Re: Once again Craig that is because I was to=d by you that that would leave twenty feet. With that fact which again you s=id only this morning you and Tom had measured turned out not to be the case=nbsp; Sorry for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone On J=n 5, 2012, at 11:15 AM, Craig Martin wrote: Ok I have documented e-mail traffic approving the 40=80 pad. You were here when it was laid out.</=iv> With the approved design of 80 ft that was the way it would f=t. Tom said when he puts in the retaining wall maybe we can get the road to 12' c EFTA_R1_00079994 EFTA01769410