From: Farkas, Andrew L. < Sent: Tuesday, April 9, 2013 5:46 PM To: [email protected]' Subject: Re: > We own the riparian and we also own the adjacent land and the govt had to grant us exclusive rights to the riparian literally by an act of the legislature which was voted into law as part of the original deal. Could you please ask Cecile for celestino's phone number again, pls? Thx. From: Jeffrey Epstein Imailto:[email protected] Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2013 11:53 AM To: Farkas, Andrew L. Subject: Re: Riparian is tricky when adverse to govtbut I assume you know that . John thought white for taxis , Jo for foot and Clovis for zero . I want you to succeed . - post-nup ( these things I know something about, real estate only a hobby On Tuesday, April 9, 2013, Farkas, Andrew L. wrote: Thanks. This will get very public and very nasty very fast. We're going to cease the payment of rent on the ground lease invoking the defense of the "first to breach doctrine." That, in turn, will put them in monetary default on the wico loan to bppr. They'll never get the funding for the dock extension and they'll never get the concession they need from us to build the new docks since they must, by definition, use our riperean rights. It'll be one giant interminable stalemate which means simply that the status quo will continue to obtain interminably. From: Jeffrey Epstein [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2013 11:24 AM To: Farkas, Andrew L Subject: Re: I'm always on your side On Tuesday, April 9, 2013, Farkas, Andrew L. wrote: No. Angrier. We're going to sue the government under the terms of the lease. They have affirmative support requirements, etc., under which they have been in default for years. We have continued to document and notice them as such in order to toll any statute. Time to stop screwing around. Since we have nothing further to lose, we're going full out and very public. Sent from my iPad EFTA_R1_00068402 E