Sent Saturday, May 16.2015 4:25:17 PM Subject Re: From: Kathy Ruemmler ‹ > To: "Jeffrey E." cjeevacation©gmail.com> Yes, definitely. On Saturday, May 16, 2015, jeffrey E. [email protected]> wrote: > Does the issue of money always color the argumentb > On Saturday, May 16, 2015, Kathy Ruemmler <[email protected]> wrote: >> But if she claims she was coerced into it when undcragc then any consent given when of age or over probably not valid as a legal matter. >> >> Sent from my iPad >> On May 16, 2015, at 9:06 AM, jeffrey E. [email protected]> wrote: >> She claims over age >> On Saturday, May 16, 2015, Kathy Ruemmler <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I think the point is that if she was underage, she could not legally consent to engaging in prostitution. >» >>> Sent from my iPad >>> On May 16, 2015, at 7:22 AM, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: >» >» if contiues to claim that she had sex with people for money, why is that not prostitution and what i plead guilty to. every massage person got paid money, no girl caem to the house to learn math, does sex for money change the equation, ? there was a massage person per day, some turned out to be younger than oterhs some as old as 60. ?? ill explain when i see you >>> On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 9:07 AM, Kathy Ruemmler <[email protected]> wrote: >>» >>>> Not yet. Last hike this morning. I get home ® 9:30 tonight. >>» >>>> On Saturday, May 16, 2015, jeffrey E. [email protected]> wrote: >>>> > are you back? >>>> > On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 8:57 AM, Kathy Ruemmler <[email protected]> wrote: »»» »»» Have you missed me? >>»» >>>> >> On Saturday, May 16, 2015, jeffrey E. <jecvacation(itemail.com> wrote: »»»> lots to talk about >>>> >> > >>>> >> > EFTA_R1_00039026 EFTA01745942