From: on behalf of Daniel Gelernter < Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 6:32 PM To: Jeffrey E. Subject: Re: numbers follow-up Honest mistake -- thanks for looking at us, Dan <=div> On Thu, Oct =2, 2015 at 2:24 PM, jeffrey E. <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]» =rote: ok, m= email that you forwarded was clear that 400k got you to either sale=or no sale . but ok with me ill withdraw On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Daniel Gelernter c > wrote: Hi Jeffrey -- Just got the docs from Darren. I understood that =ou were interested in investing the full $1M. We appreciate the offe= but the terms don't make sense for us for $400k. R=gards, Dan On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 7:13 PM, jeffrey E. <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: better but too complex , =AO for ex , 400k . first everyone gets their money back,=C2 and the split is . 50 50 untl 20 million 60.40 up=until 40. 70 30 above 50. the larger amounts in y=ur favor of course On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Daniel Gelernter <mailto » wrote: Dear Jeffrey - Reg=rding our conversation yesterday, we'd propose the following for a $1M=investment: Any sale at or above $50=, the investor gets 20% Any sale bet=een $30M and $50M, the investor gets 22% Any sale at or below $30M, and the investor's share as a percentage=is calculated as .09)02 - 4.6X + 80, where Xis the sale price in millions= This will guarantee a return on the investment for sales as low as $1=5M (which would produce a 10% return). A $4M sale would return the i=vestor $2.5M, a $10M sale would return $4.3M, etc. Would welco=e your thoughts and your investment. =br> EFTA_R1_00006423 EFTA01732837