From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2015 8:54 PM To: Jeffrey Epstein I previoudly sent you the note that=l wrote over a year ago. to lay out what i would and wouldn't do.my resposniblites. and thos= that were not. things I thought were needed so that you wouldnt fin= yourself in the place where you currently find yourself. Wit= regard the more pressing issue I am uncertain of just how to proceed. I am torn, as my very strong inclination is not to be=20 involved at all. It is extremely time consuming, delicate, fraught w=th many pitfall many that will make you very upset and a major pain in the ass. =AO I wrote you months ago that the quality of the people involved need to =e upgraded. ( lucky for me these last issues arose way before the begi=ning of my involvement ) I am also aware however of my overar=hing friendship obligations of ok, -given all the complexities =who else can do it? problem. Your family office needs a daddy. child=en with good intentions are running around , sniping , nitpicking with little direction. As a stopgap measure I am suggesting , we put in Larry Delson to take charge Everyo=e would report to him. eileen included. He would however work for me. this is not, by a long=shot my first choice as I prefer only being responsible and standing behind =y own personal work ( ie the word DONE will no longer be transmi=ted to reflect status stated by others ) With =o commitment on my part whatsoever, to do it. So far as I have failed in my attempt in trying to think through the problem creatively=. My organizations handling of the more complex issues I believe you might find very costly, very ! ( however many structures available some risk s=aring, maybe risk caps ,etc ) but would require my to=ms doing the work , not yours. Ada should be only a trust, grat administrator. not sure what role you prefer for=Eileen as you hired her initially to oversee investments. whether Ric= your controller s