From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2015 10:06 AM To: Daniel Gelernter Subject: Re: numbers follow-up silly response. Lesson=1 why risk no deal for such a small difference in a big=win. ? On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Daniel Gelernter ote: Hi =effery -- Fair enough; we could accept that if you'd make it 65-=5 above 20M and 80-20 above 50M, and if we could close this right away. Regards, Dan On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 7:13 PM, jeffrey =. <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]» wrote: better but too compl=x , for ex , 400k . first everyone get= their money back, and the split is . 50 50 untl 20 mill=on 60.40 up until 40. 70 30 above 50. the =arger amounts in your favor of course =br> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Danie= Gelernte wrote: <=div> Any s=le at or above $50M, the investor gets 20% Any sale between $30M and $50M, the investor gets 22% Any sale at or below $30M, and the investor's sh=re as a percentage is calculated as .09)02 - 4.6X + 80, where Xis the sal= price in millions. This will guarantee a return on the investment for=sales as low as $1.5M (which would produce a 10% return). A $4M sale=would return the investor $2.5M, a $10M sale would return $4.3M, etc. Would welcome your thoughts and your investment. Regards, Dan<=div> please note EFTA_R1_00005441 EFTA01732114