From: on behalf of Daniel Gelernter < :. Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2015 2:20 PM To: Jeffrey Epstein Subject: Re: numbers follow-up I take your point. We acc=pt the deal on your terms if we can close right away. Best, Dan On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 6:05 AM, Jeffrey E. &=t;jeevacation@g=ailcom <mailto:[email protected]» wrote: silly response. Lesson 1= why risk no deal for such a small difference in a big win. ?=C24, On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Daniel Gelernter > wrote: =i Jeffery -- Fair enough; we could accept that if you'd make it =5-35 above 20M and 80-20 above 50M, and if we could close this right away.=div> Regards, Dan On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 7:13 PM, jeffr=y E. <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: better but too comp=ex , for ex , 400k . first everyone ge=s their money back, and the split is . 50 50 untl 20 mil=ion 60.40 up until 40. 70 30 above 50. the=larger amounts in your favor of course On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Dani=l Gelernter <mailto - > wrote: Dear Jeffrey - Regarding our conversation yesterday, we'd propose the=following for a $1M investment: =/div> Any =ale at or above $50M, the investor gets 20% Any sale between $30M and $50M, the investor gets 22% Any sale at or below $30M, and the investor's s=are as a percentage is calculated as .09)02 - 4.6X + 80, where Xis the sa=e price in millions. This will guarantee a return on the investment fo= sales as low as $1.5M (which would produce a 10% return). A $4M sal= would return the investor $2.5M, a $10M sale would return $4.3M, etc. EFTA_R1_00005195 EFTA01731948