From: ' To:' Subject: Re: Question re Epstein Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2008 20:20:53 +0000 Importance: Normal Fax is being sent now to . Pis respond that u rcvd. From: To: Cc: Sent: Wed Dec 03 13:26:43 2008 Subject: Question re Epstein Hi Nand El I wanted to give you something to think about before our 2:00 conference call. and I have been doing some digging into the situation and have found out some really disturbing info. It appears that, since Day I, Goldberger and (the State Attorney) have been scheming to get Epstein out on work release. For example, the indictment incorrectly charges Epstein for an offense that would have made him ineligible for work release if it had been charged correctly. (Remember that also went along with letting us believe that Epstein was pleading twistrable offense when Epstein's folks and believed that he the offense was not registrable.) and Goldberger also told us that Epstein would be housed at the Palm Bch Cty Jail, not the Stockade, but he would not have been eligible for work release if at the jail. Judge McSorley has a standing order that allows PBSO to grant work release to any defendant she has sentenced who is housed at the Stockade. Judge Pucillo (the actual sentencing judge) does not have that order. So Goldberger prepared the "nunc pro tunc" order, including the language that we had specifically rejected, to Judge McSorley for her signature. Obviously the State Attorney's Office had notice of the order but no one ever told us and they had a copy of the Non-Prosecution Agreement which contains clear language that the Nunc Pro Tune would violate the Agreement. As part of his work release, Epstein has hired off-duty Sheriff's deputies to provide him with "protection." It appears that he is paying between $3000 and $4100 per week for this service, despite the work release rules barring anyone from the Sheriff's Office (and the Sheriff's Office itself) from having "any business transactions with inma