GLDUS133 Georgetown University Endowment Consistent top returns among peers SOF Funds vs Cambridge Associates' secondary funds performance' 7'3 Secondary funds: Net IRR4 to limited partners Secondary funds: Net multiples to limited partners 50% - 45% - 40% - 35% et 30% - ix 1; 25% - 5% - 0% + Upper Quartile S0F 22% t Lower Quartile • Media n SOF D 29% SOF II 20% SOF III 30% 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 2 5x 0.5x • 0.0x SOF TVPI = 1.84x DPI = 1.80x SOF D TVPI =2.3x DPI = 2.1x SOF II TVPI = 1 5x DPI= 1.2x SOF III TVPI = 1 3x DPI = 0.3x '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 • Index DPI Index RVPI SOF funds DPI SOF funds RVPI 11) Source' Cambric* Associates Secondaries Benchmark statistics as of September 30. 2017 based on data complied from 140 secondary [Kt with a retiid nutn (A Lands per vear. ;n-iticlina fully liquidated partnerships. fanned between .Q04 and 2014 Earth SOF Fund its startsbenchmarked against their respect Vintage peer oiodp..This inromnaion ierftectsa compariSiM or Si3F. s SDF II arid SO)- III performaivre against one benchmark only: quart*es may differ when corarileed to ether benctereirking seines. SOF. ra UF. SOF J. SCir it and SOF data snot included in IF* data sad reed to calculate the beittirialk data (21 Information veserted in this chair is based an the inauelted results of SOF, SOF 0. SOF II and SOF In as vi September 3D. 2017 and ts+culd be read and ftMewed in con)tettion with the important Information" and Wes to investinent Performance Intimation' sections of !MIS d-Ocialligni (31 Past performance is n'$ a plight-Pon of the future 1:4900fIttext6 Of SOF. SOF 0, SOF If or SOF HI but is included to denmnstrae the track record vi the Gler45wer SOF Team. (41 internal rates of returns are net of fees. expenses and tamed interest. Cambridge .Assoaates research shots that most funds trite et feast six years to settle irto their final quartile tanking. anrA IN