Tisch — let's discuss. I know less about the history than you do. Does it really go back to 1976? I also go back to 1976 . . . I've done the opportunity/challenge write ups for GA and Deering below, so you just need to do the client overview. We can wrap that up first thing Monday hopefully. GA/Madison Park We have substantial opportunity to pursue with this account. The partners control a lot of capital and are financially sophisticated. They are willing to look at any interesting transaction. While this is an opportunity, it is also a challenge since there is no specific focus. We have traded CLO equity with them, and discussed everything from risk premia to real estate to private markets. More challenging is the fact that they have relationships with the entire street and each partner also has money managed away from the internal family office. Because they are a large private equity firm, they have access to a lot of direct deal flow. We need to find a way to be more relevant to them. Deering/Crosby We have several opportunities to pursue with the Deering/Crosby family as outlined below. There are a few challenges. First, Heather Crosby runs an RIA that helps manage the Deering family assets. The RIA has pushed for an overly simple, low fee asset allocation. Despite serving as an RIA, they seem relatively unsophisticated. The Crosby assets are not managed by the RIA, and Heather handles this account more directly despite having limited time to focus on it. Her husband is a private equity partner, and earns a lot of money, so perhaps portfolio management isn't the first priority. Finally, the family and the RIA seem to have relationships with every bank on the street, so there is lots of competition. Deering — given the recent passing of Tony Deering, there will be a continued opportunity to reevaluate the asset allocation as his assets are passed to his wife and eventually to the rest of his family. We recently repriced a margin loan for the