Page 27 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 97188, * warranty extension -- along with monetary awards that will not be calculated in the aggregate until all claim submission periods have ended and Defendants have processed the claims. ECF No. 86 at 18. 2. The lodestar calculation supports an award of between $1,917,673.40 and $2,320,000 in fees and expenses Plaintiffs seek attorneys' fees and expenses in the total amount of $2,320,000, which is 31.5 percent less than their lodestar calculation of $3,387,328.75. ECF No. 86 at 22.' Defendants do not argue that Class Counsel is entitled to less than the lodestar amount, but instead argue that Plaintiffs' $3,387,328.75 lodestar calculation is itself incorrect, based on unreasonably high billing rates and insufficient documentation of the hours reportedly billed by Class Counsel. ECF No. 90 at 1. 3 In their reply brief in further support of their motion for attorneys' fees. Plaintiffs submit that this sum has increased by an additional $113.606. ECF No. 105 at 1. 1 n.1 (citing Norton v. Wilshire Credit Corp.. 36 F. Supp. 2d 216. 219 (D.N.J. 1999) ("Prevailing parties may also collect reasonable attorney's fees for time spent preparing the fee petition?) (citing Institutionalized Juveniles v. Secretary of Pub. Welfare, 758 F.2d 897. 92425 (3d Cir. 1985)). Because Defendants r82) address the hours and billing rates reported in Plaintiffs' original motion, and because this calculation adequately supports the award Plaintiffs seek. the Court performs its analysis using the hours and billing rates reported in the original motion. The Court calculates the lodestar amount by multiplying the number of hours "reasonably worked" on a client's case by a "reasonable hourly billing rate for such services based on the given geographical area, the nature of the services provided, and the experience of the attorneys." Ins. Brokerage, 579 F.3d at 280 (quoting Rite Aid, 396 F.3d at 302). "To examine the lodestar factor properly,