Cc: Patrick Campion < ; Andrew Gallivan Subject: RE: Ashley deposit update [I] Classification: For internal use only What controls can be put in place to ensure that all present and future employees who service this relationship will know that this side letter exists? Kimberly Hart Managing Director I Divisional Control Officer Wealth Management Americas Deutsche Bank Trust Com Americas Securities offered through Deutsche Bank Secunties Inc. From: Stewart Oldfield Sent: Friday, May 18, 2018 2:27 PM To: Charlie Burrows 41MII IIIMIM Anthony Western ; Kimberly Hart Nicholas Haigh Rachel Goodwin <a, ; Andrew Gallivan <= Cc: Patrick Campion Subject: Ashley deposit update Team, Just got off my third call with the client today, all of which have been about the setoff and lien language we have been negotiating. Unfortunately, the other bank Ashley is working with for deposits has agreed to simply remove all setoff and lien language from their deposit agreement, recognizing that there should be no situation (other than an operational error) that would give rise to an obligation from Ashley to the bank. And of course they're not waiving any rights to go after money owed, they just won't lien and setoff the account. I don't know which bank they are working with on this, but believe it to be either Goldman or JPM. Not surprisingly, they want us to do the same as the other bank. If we cannot (or will not) I think we will still get some deposits, but likely less than we want. However, they will never give us any lending business. And we would still need to agree to water down the language we've been negotiating. Please help. I would like to agree to remove the language they don't like (via a sideletter, not a new set of T&Cs). If we ever do a lending deal with them, we can properly negotiate collateral provisions then, when we will have more leverage. In the meantime, I don't think we have a major risk here, since all we are doing is opening a de