Page 26 874 F.3d 787, *; 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 20596, **; Bankr. L. Rep. (CCH) P83,176; 64 Bankr. Ct. Dec. 216 reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.' With one exception, we conclude that the reorganization plan (the "Plan") confirmed by the bankruptcy court and affirmed by the district court comports with Chapter 11. We remand so that the bankruptcy court can address the single deficiency we identify in the proceedings below, which is the process for determining the proper interest rate under the cramdown provision of Chapter 11. 1 Momently° Performance Materials, Inc.'s 'MPM." and with affiliated debtors. 'Debtors'. MPM, a leading producer of silicone, faced serious financial problems after it took on significant new debt obligations beginning in the mid-2000s.= See 15-1771 JA 286-88; 15- 1682 JA 1605-O6.' Following these debt issuances, MPM was substantially overleveraged, and ultimately filed a [*"4] petition under Chapter 11. The four relevant classes of notes issued by MPM are as follows: 2 The facts recounted herein derive principally from the bankruptcy courts decision confirming Debtors' reorganization plan, In re MPM Silicones. LLC. 2014 Bankr. LEXIS 3926. 2014 WL 4436335 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Seq. 9, 2014). affd 531 B.R. 321 (S.0.N.Y. 2015). as well as the public disclosures made part of the record. We rely on the facts recounted in the banlcruptcy court's ruling in light of our "obliglafionl to accept the bankruptcy court's undisturbed findings of fact unless they are dearly erroneous." Brunner v. New York State Higher Educ. Servs. Corp.. 831 F.2d 395. 396 (2d Cir. 1987). 3 As discussed, infra note 4, we resolve with this opinon three separate appeals. Our citations to the respective records will begin with the relevant docket number on appeal, and references to "JA" are to the respective joint appendices filed with that appeal. For example. our citation to '15-1771 JA 296-881 is to pages 286-88 of the joint appendix