GI.DDS183 Dimension Capital Management Section 2: Investment Performance Glendower Capital Secondary Opportunities Fund TV, LP In Exhibit 2 each of SOF. SOF D. SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage peer group reported in the Cambridge Associates Secondaries Benchmark statistics (September 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR. DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark " 34 37 Secondary funds: Net IRR to limited partners Secondary funds: Net multiple to limited partners so% 'S. 104. 20if " • n. 64 • :Apt. (44ann Low "J.,* • wads, aof als • • ; sac Sof rrc acs rosr sy. • t • i; t 2* IS= I It 0 St Iv" I SC DPI • I at, 00 03 It. • ! 14 04 di o Dm. 31. SO; twi ; I 0(• e II iVAr I3. OF' • 0 I. I . or te *C9 10 11 12 13 11 ohm OM no* mot r SOF Imo CPI SC, tea RYPI In Exhibit 3. each of SOF. SOF D. SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout funds reported in the Cambridge Associates Global Buyout Benchmark as of September 30. 2017. Again, the SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 3: Buyout•hke returns with a secondary risk profiles vlw OPP •• I 3. Os' 0:' Xdf. PA 1,A .R4 is. Alt A" nr) I Wee 0. • s..• it••• • WI • •• 1 • fad tt X•lo • al a.1 •*ye Ni • oc= ift sot art 0 Some: Cambridge Associates Secondaries Benchmack statistics as of September 30 2017 SOF Funds are shown benchmarked against their vintage yew peer group SOF and SOF 0 performance is riot included in the data se teed to calculate the tenclvnark data Note that the performance figures in rasped d SW and SOF D have not been audried and aloft be reed and reviewed in common:4i will Appendix 5 impOrtanIParlonnanCe Imismatton Past pedamance of SOF Fulls 6 not a prediction of future performance. Informat