From: Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacatione mail.com> To: Erdoes, Mary E < CC: Staley, Jes Shenker. Nina O" <[email protected]> Sent: 5/30/2011 12:46:38 PM Subject: Re: fyi info needed, -- managed acct NAV at 10 /05 10 /06. realized value,? .. redemption schedule , we have documnets that schulte had a meeting to disclose wrongdoing sept 06 BEFORE my withdrawal request and the discussions why I should not redeem my entire 140 million. but reduce it to 80million. Managed acct should have had virtually the same assets as the Fund. On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Erdoes, Mary E < :=. wrote: Jeffrey- Yes, we are going to have Condren step in here on this issue as well as the Bear issues. We will have everyone get together this week, if possible, and then we will see what to do from there. Mary From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> To: Erdoes, Mary E; Staley, Jes Sent: Mon May 30 03:36:28 2011 Subject fyi I think you should ask Wendall to recall the meeting he had with Sussman and Glenn. Glenn was unequivocal., adamant ,and loud in front of them both - that had he known about ziwm taking money for the airplane ( form the Highbridge acct no less , in dec of 04 ).. he would have immediatley told me to take all my money out . He said he would have taken all his money out .. We only receintly received the doc re garding the schulte meeting„ ( shulte was called in in investigate the problem ), where though my oral redemption request was in oct, and the written reduced demand on NOV. 13,schulte had a meeting in sept in which glenn attended, that informed Zwirn and Glenn of the problem in detail. ( wendall knows this!y I am aware of the issue being legal vs moral duty. However , the legal is abundantly clear once all the documents are reviewed, as opposed to only what wendalll has. I expressed in no uncertain terms in talking with Condren that I view this as a dispute ( Me vs JPM , in the Bear STearns case) as a family disagreement,. ho