Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 268 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/22/2014 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 0S-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 V. UNITED STATES • 1 • i JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S SEALED SUPPLEMENT SUPPORTING RESPONSE TO GOVERNMENT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE RELEVANCE OBJECTIONS TO PETITIONER'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to file this sealed supplement containing additional information supporting the victims response to the Government's Relevance Objections to Victims' First Request for Production to the Government (DE 260). The following e-mails, under seal by order of the Court, demonstrate that the victims' allegations of a conspiracy between the Government and Epstein's attorneys to conceal the existence of a broad, non-prosecution agreement are not mere speculation, but appear to be well supported. 1. E-mail from Marie C. Ann Villafafta to Jay Lefkowitz, Sept. 19, 2007: Andy recommended that some of the time issues be addressed only in the state agreement, so that it isn't obvious to the judge that we are trying to create federal jurisdiction for prison purposes. .. . . . . As I mentioned over the telephone, I cannot bind the girls to the Trust Agreement, and I don't think it is appropriate that a state court would administer a trust that seeks to pay for federal civil claims. We both want to avoid unscrupulous attorneys and/or litigations from coming forward, and I know that your client wants to keep these matters outside of public court filings, but I just EFTA01206321