IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT CASE NO. 4D14-2282 BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, RECEIVED, 10/1/2015 12:59 PM, Clerk, Fourth District Court of Appeal Appellant, -vs- JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Appellee. APPELLANT'S RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL ARGUMENT Appellant, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, by and through undersigned counsel, hereby files this Response to the Motion for Leave to file Supplemental Argument filed by the Appellee, Jeffrey Epstein. There is no justification for supplemental briefing in this case. Epstein's motion is solely a desperate attempt to inject new issues into this appeal at the eleventh hour, which unfairly burdens not only Edwards, but also this Court. Epstein had ample opportunity to raise whatever issues he wanted in his Answer Brief, and his belated attempt to seek supplemental briefing on the eve of oral argument is obviously a recognition that the arguments in his Answer Brief can no longer sustain the judgment below. 1 EFTA01200578