home

epstein-data
Research ▼
🔍 SearchFull-text document search 🤖 Ask AIAI research assistant 🔎 Evidence MapFBI serial resolution 📷 Reverse Image SearchCLIP + face across 614K images 🧑 Find Face BETASearch 29K faces by photo 💻 Run Your OwnDownload & search locally
Explore ▼
📚 Full Text Corpus1.39M docs, 2.77M pages 🌎 Global Heatmap145 countries mentioned 📈 Coverage MapWhat's here 🌌 AtlasSemantic map · 1.29M docs ⚖ Cases53 federal & state cases · per-case briefings 🎤 DepositionsTranscribed audio & video 💬 Hear from the SurvivorsSurvivors in their own words 📖 Cover to Cover-Up24-hour public reading, synced to the video ✉ Wolff–Epstein Emails2,009 messages · 2009–2019
📷 Images92K analyzed photographs 🔍 Multi-DB SearchSearch all databases individually 🗃 All Databases14 searchable databases
Reports
News ▼
📰 NewsCoverage & reporting ⚖ Justice MonitorArrests, charges, lawsuits, firings
Source ▼
🏛 DOJ ProductionOfficial EFTA disclosures 📜 EFTA Law TextPublic Law 119-38 📁 Source Data (GitHub)Open source databases
🌐 Community ResourcesCurated external projects ✉ ContactGeneral · privacy · DMCA · press
❤️ Donate 🎧 Podcast

Research

🔍 Search Documents 🤖 Ask AI 🔎 Evidence Map 📷 Reverse Image Search 🧑 Find Face BETA 💻 Run Your Own Investigator

Explore

📚 Full Text Corpus 🌎 Global Heatmap 📈 Coverage Map 🌌 Atlas ⚖ Cases 🎤 Depositions 💬 Hear from the Survivors 📖 Cover to Cover-Up ✉ Wolff–Epstein Emails 📷 Images 🔍 Multi-DB Search 🗃 All Databases

Reports

Browse All Reports 📰 News ⚖ Justice Monitor

Source

🏛 DOJ Production 📜 EFTA Law 📁 Source Data (GitHub) 🌐 Community Resources ✉ Contact
🎧 Podcast & Newsletter ❤️ Donate Privacy Policy

EFTA01182903

← Prev Next →
Loading document…

Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 91 Filed 04/11/16 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK X VIRGINIA L GIUFFRE, Plaintiff, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. X 15-cv-07433-RWS Motion To Exceed Page Limits For Reply In Support Of Defendant's Motion To Compel Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, through counsel, hereby requests that the Court permit the filing of a reply memorandum in excess of the 10 pages permitted pursuant to this Court's Practice Standard 2D. As grounds, she further avers as follows: Defendant was forced to bring her Motion to Compel as to each and every one of Plaintiff's interrogatory responses and each and every one of her responses to the Request for Production. The issues raised in the Motion to Compel are at once novel (Plaintiff asserts, for example, a "public interest privilege" which is unavailable to individual, non-governmental litigants) and mundane (Plaintiff completely refused to answer interrogatories, even though they comply with the Federal and Local Rules). Because of the breadth of the issues raised, Defendant's obligations in fully and fairly responding to Plaintiffs intransigence and creative litigation tactics could not be amply be set forth in 10 pages. 1 EFTA01182903

Suggest a category
Misclassified? Pick a better fit.
Community Notes
▸ People Mentioned
▸ Interest Level
Routine Notable Significant
▸ Dates Mentioned
▸ Related Topics
▸ Places & Organizations
▸ Transcription Correction
Related documents
Source Data Investigation Reports DOJ EFTA CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 Contact
Independent research project. Not affiliated with the U.S. Department of Justice, FBI, any government agency, or Anthropic. All analytical text on this site is AI-generated (Claude, Anthropic) and iteratively fact-checked against source documents, but may contain errors. Verify all claims against linked EFTA sources before citing.
Powered by Datasette  ·  ❤️ Buy me a coffee

You are leaving epstein-data.com

You are being redirected to an external website not operated by this project. We are not responsible for the content or privacy practices of external sites.

Powered by Datasette