From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> To: drsra Subject: Re: Fw: Settlement Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 22:24:02 +0000 Inline-Images: image001.png yes, you can call me On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 6:09 PM, drsra < wrote: Your thoughts? Mike has supposedly found a buyer, but he has told lies constantly & I don't trust him. Is the wiser course to just pay the $60,000.00 and be done with it? - - On Mon, 10/31/11, Leanne Seibert > wrote: From: Leanne Seibert Subject: Settlement To: mdrsram Cc: "Trent Steele" - Date: Monday, October 31, 2011, 5:38 PM Trent asked me to send you this information on the settlement. Kranz originally said $100,000 plus closing costs to be paid 1/2 by Hardman and 1/2 by you contingent on the short sale closing. We agreed to pay $60,000 now, but only if they released you whether or not the short sale closed. Then the bank agreed to release you upon payment of the $60,000 now, without it being contingent on closing and they said they were not going to release Hardman's guarantee. Now we get the letter that says they are not requiring a payment from Hardman and will release his guarantee contingent on closing within 45 days. Otherwise the letter provides that if the short sale falls through, the bank will proceed with the foreclosure sale and no release of Hardman. The $60,000 from you is for a full release now regardless of whether or not the short sale closes. The letter indicates that the foreclosure sale will go through if the property does not close before January 12, 2012. In that case the buyer could bid their offer at the foreclosure sale or negotiate with the bank after the foreclosure sale and the bank could still prosecute their case on the guarantees against you and Hardman. You indicated you wanted the matter resolved now and be done with it. If you want to pay nothing now we can go back to Kranz and make that demand, but then you would only be released if the short sale closes. Not too long ago they tur