Jay P. Lelkoveltz, P.C. To Call Writer Directly: June 16, 2009 VIA FACSIMILE Esq. United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear I write in response to your letter dated June 15, 2009. At this point, it has been well over two years since the federal government's initial involvement into what was originally a state prosecutorial matter. It has been almost a year since, pursuant to the terms of the federal Non- Prosecution Agreement (the "NPA"), Mr. Epstein first pleaded guilty in state court and began serving his sentence in county jail. When Mr. Epstein was sentenced, the U.S. Attorney promised that the federal government's involvement would cease provided that Mr. Epstein served his sentence and was treated no differently from any other state prisoner. We take this opportunity to address in detail each of the alleged instances you describe to support your contention that Mr. Epstein has engaged in pattern of breaching the NPA. We respectfully submit (and support through documentary evidence) that Mr. Epstein has done nothing to breach the NPA. He simply wants to complete his sentence without further involvement or intimidation by the federal government, as he was promised. As an initial matter, it is important to consider your recent allegations in context. Mr. Epstein has, and continues to, satisfy his obligations pursuant to the NPA. In order to satisfy the claimed federal interest in this matter, Mr. Epstein pleaded guilty to a registerable offense, pursuant to he has already he registered as a sex offenderrupen-his-celease-fr-em-pcise* and he has served the-meiefity-ochis sentence in county jail. While such a plea and punishment was not otherwise sought by the State Attorney, Mr. Epstein agreed to his plea and sentence as a direct result of the NPA. Furthermore, Mr. Epstein has paid over ;4.00;000250k in settlementesettlements and fees to women you identified as victims and, in one case, pa