I am in receipt of your letter dated June 15. I am sorry to read it as I sense your frustration with the entire matter, however, I write to try to set the record straight. Your letter is filled with misstated facts , miscahreceratizaions, and misrepresentations . in many instance that directly contradicts the written record, IN each instance where you have suggested a breach in the past I have attached ,the releveant correspondence or documents, that clearly refute some of your statements. I would remind you that mr Epstein has almost completed his couty jail sentence. Of 18 months. A sentence of incarceration that he took only as a result of your deferring prosecution. He plead guilty to a registrable offense as your required and has already registered as a sex offendfer. He has paid over 10k thousand dollars in fees to the attoruny reperesnt ive and have paid out 150 thoussand dollars in settlements to victims on your lislt„ in one case to someone , he had no recolecction of meeting, and who was not challeneged to provide any evience to test the veracity of her claim. To begin you suggest that Mr Epstein did not use hid best efforts to enter his guilty plea, as I am sure you reember this was done with the personal consent of alex accost the us attorney, whose e mail to that regard is attached. The nine month delay was dictated by the justie depatanets time frame. When in late June, when the last appeal was exhausted , we had only one week to plead,. We sent the state plea to you , as soon as we received it. It had only been prepared by the state the day before. When you sent your first notice, you may have forgotten, that jack Goldberger and you had agreed „in fact that the language was correct. And only at your insistince did you want tl insert the word jail sentence, this was done , and the state plea agreement was drafted by the state prosecutor not Mr epstiens attorneys. So I find your claim of breach inaccurate. 2. you then clai that