RECEIVED JUN 19 2013 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY. FLORIDA CASE NO.: 50-2009-CA-040800-XXXX JEFFREY EPSTEIN, CIVIL DIVISION "AG" Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and L.M., individually, Defendant(s) and Counter-Plaintiff(s). ORDER DENYING COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION/RECONSIDERATION THIS CAUSE came before the Court on Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's (the "Counter-Defendant") Motion for Clarification/Reconsideration of this Court's Order Dated May 17, 2013, filed on May 28, 2013. This Court. having heard argument on the motion and having carefully reviewed the Counter-Defendant's objections and all applicable legal authority, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises dots hereby determine as follows: BACKGROUND On March I I, 2013. this Court entered an Order (the "First Discovery Order") requiring the Counter-Defendant to file a detailed privilege log in response to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley Edwards' (the "Counter-Plaintiff') Request for Production and Net Worth Interrogatories. The Order stated that the Counter-Defendant was not required to list any documents on the privilege log that he asserted were protected by his constitutional privilege against self-incrimination. The Counter- Defendant responded to this Court's Order by filing a privilege log wherein he asserted a Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination as to essentially every document request and interrogatory, as well as asserting that many documents were protected by attorney-client privilege, accountant-client privilege. trade secret privilege, work product privilege. and third party privacy EFTA01128873