UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE I AND JANE DOE 2, Plaintiffs v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant INTERVENOR JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF HIS ATTENDANCE AT OR PARTICIPATION IN SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein has requested that he be permitted to attend, through counsel, the settlement conference convened in this matter. The right to participate in the settlement conference flows inexorably from Judge Marra's granting of Mr. Epstein's motion to intervene as of right ,at the remedy stage of these proceedings . That right, allows him to advocate for why the remedy in this case-assuming of course that the plaintiffs can establish their entitlement to any remedy at all, —should not extend to the one suggested by the plaintiffs namely the rescission of his nonprosecution agreement . In addition he has the right to intervene his grant of on the issue of release of information falling within the grand July secrecy protections of Rule 6(e). There are both strong constitutional and contractual arguments for maintaining the inviolability of Mr. Epstein's nonprosecution agreement, however , if plaintiffs still intend to pursue this remedy, that are common to both the government and to Mr. Epstein, other compelling reasons why the nonprosecution agreement should not be invalidated are personal to EFTA01128645