IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO.: 502009CA040800 AG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff(s), vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, etc., et al., Defendant(s). ORDER ON MOTION 1 0 DISQUALIFY OPPOSING COUNSEL THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the Counter-Plaintiff, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS' Motion to Disqualify Counsel for JEFFREY EPSTEIN and, more specifically, Fred Haddad. The Court received evidence and testimony, heard argument of counsel, has reviewed the memorandums filed both in support and opposition to the Motion, and has reviewed the various authorities cited. Based upon the foregoing, it is CONSIDERED, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: The Counter-Plaintiff, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, seeks to disqualify Attorney Fred Haddad on the basis that Mr. Haddad represents Russell Adler, EDWARDS' former supervisor at the Rothstein Rosenfeldt & Adler law firm. It is unclear the specific Rule Regulating the Florida Bar that EDWARDS contends justifies disqualification. Nevertheless, EDWARDS argues that Mr. Haddad "may" have access to confidential communications or work product information not between EDWARDS' and his attorney in this matter but in the underlying litigation giving rise to the current matter. Disqualification of one's chosen lawyer is an extraordinary remedy and should be resorted to in very limited circumstances. See e.g., Frank, Weinberg & Black, P.A. u. Effman, 916 So.2d 917 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005). In fact, trial courts are instructed to EFTA01125800