JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY j, EDWARDS, Individually, and L.M., individually. Defendants. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG PLAINTIFF COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF BRADLEY EDWARDS' MOTION TO COMPEL PROPER ANSWER OR TO DEEM UNANSWERED ALLEGATIONS ADMITTED Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein" or "Plaintiff"), by and through his undersigned counsel and pursuant to Rule 1.110(e) of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby moves this Court to enter an order striking the Defendant/Counter- Plaintiff Bradley Edwards' ("Edwards" or "Defendant") Motion to Compel Proper Answer [sic] or to Deem Unanswered Allegations Admitted. In support thereof, Plaintiff states: INTRODUCTION On May 21, 2012, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley Edwards filed his Third Amended Counterclaim against Epstein. On June 11, 2012, Epstein filed his Answer and Affirmative Defenses thereto. On June 18, 2012, Edwards filed his Motion to Compel Proper Answer [sic] or Deem Unanswered Allegations Admitted. Edwards provides neither supporting case law nor rules of procedure in support of his Motion, because his request is in direct contravention with the law. Edwards further fails to attach a copy of the EFTA01121870