Filing # 33747975 E-Filed 10/27/2015 04:45:57 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: CACE 15-000072 BRADLEY J. EDWARDS and PAUL G. CASSELL, Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants, vs. ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff. DEFENDANT/COUNTERCLAIM PLAINTIFF ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ'S REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS/COUNTERCLAIM DEFENDANTS' RESPONSE TO MOTION TO COMPEL Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ ("Dershowitz"), through counsel, hereby files his Reply to the Response filed by Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants' BRADLEY J. EDWARDS ("Edwards") and PAUL G. CASSELL ("Cassell") (together, "Plaintiffs") in opposition to Dershowitz's Motion to Compel Production of Documents and Complete Responses to Interrogatories (the "Motion to Compel" ),I INTRODUCTION At the outset of their Response, Plaintiffs spend several pages attempting to document at At issue are Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants' discovery responses and objections in Dershowitz's Motion to Compel, as well as Edwards's Objection to Request No. 2 in Response to Dershowitz's Second Set of Document Requests and Cassell's Objection to Request No. 2 in Response to Dershowitz's Third Set of Document Requests, per Dershowitz's Amended Notice of Hearing dated September 10, 2015. Plaintiffs served these additional discovery responses after Dershowitz's Motion to Compel had been filed with the Court but maintain, in part, the same objections. Dershowitz therefore added them on to the presently scheduled hearing for purposes of efficiency, as opposed to preparing an entirely new amended motion. EFTA01116468