EFTA01098826

Loading document…

Re: Epstein v. Sitrick Darren: Well, here is the Request for Production that was threatened by Sitrick's attorney. Let's discuss because some of the requests are objectionable and subject to a Motion for Protective Order. For others, the documents probably do not exist. I am curious regarding the request for correspondence during an arbitration proceeding in California. Was there an arbitration proceeding? Chester Attachment cc: JE EFTA01098826

Suggest a category
Misclassified? Pick a better fit.
Source Data Investigation Reports DOJ EFTA CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 Contact
Independent research project. Not affiliated with the U.S. Department of Justice, FBI, any government agency, or Anthropic. All analytical text on this site is AI-generated (Claude, Anthropic) and iteratively fact-checked against source documents, but may contain errors. Verify all claims against linked EFTA sources before citing.
Powered by Datasette  ·  ❤️ Buy me a coffee

You are leaving epstein-data.com

You are being redirected to an external website not operated by this project. We are not responsible for the content or privacy practices of external sites.