JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J, EDWARDS, individually. Defendants. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE H1- I EENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG JUDGE: CROW PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S AMENDED ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF BRADLEY EDWARDS'S FOURTH AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned counsel and pursuant to Rule 1.110 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby files this Amended Answer and Affirmative Defenses to DefendanUCounter-Plaintiff Bradley Edwards's ("Edwards") Fourth Amended Counterclaim ("Counterclaim"), and states: 1. Epstein admits that the Counterclaim alleges an amount within the jurisdictional purview of the Court, but denies that Edwards is entitled to said amount. 2. Epstein is without knowledge as to Edwards's residential status, but admits that he is an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Florida. 3. Epstein admits that he is sui juris, but denies that he is a resident of Palm Beach County, Florida. 4. Epstein admits that he entered into a plea agreement that resulted in a felony conviction. Epstein further admits that the terms and conditions of the agreement speak for themselves. To the extent that Edwards has inaccurately summarized or interpreted any provision thereof in Paragraph 4 of his Counterclaim, Epstein denies the allegations. EFTA01084920