IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO.: 502009CA040800 AG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff(s), vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, etc., et al., Defendant(s). ORDER ON DEFENDANT EDWARDS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the Defendant, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS' Motion for Summary Judgment in regard to the claims brought by the Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN. The Court, after carefully considering the arguments of the attorneys, after examining all pertinent pleadings, affidavits and other matters of record in regard to the Motion makes the following findings and legal rulings. Upon Motion for Summary Judgment, the movant has the burden of conclusively demonstrating the non-existence of any genuine issue of material fact. Noll v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40, 43 (Fla. 1966). The burden of demonstrating the existence of genuine issues does not shift to the opposing party until the movant has successfully met its burden. Sasson v. Rockwell Mfg. Co., 715 So.2d 1066 (Fla. 3tel DCA 1998). When considering a Motion for Summary Judgment, it is settled that a trial court is not permitted to weigh material conflicting evidence or pass upon the credibility of the witnesses. Id. at 1067. Further, the Court must draw every possible inference in favor of the party against whom a Summary Judgment is sought. Gonzalez v. B & B Cash Grocery Stores, 692 So.2d 297 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). If the record raises even the slightest doubt that EFTA01082060