Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 221 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/08/2013 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 v. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S RESPONSE TO THIRD MOTION FOR "LIMITED" INTERVENTION OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to oppose the third motion of Jeffrey Epstein for limited intervention in this case. DE 215. The Court should deny the motion as untimely and not factually supported. BACKGROUND As the Court will recall, Epstein initially delayed intervening in this case but, more recently, has filed three separate motions for "limited" intervention on three different topics. Several years ago, Epstein sent in defense attorneys to intervene regarding certain correspondence regarding the non-prosecution agreement. The victims objected at that time to his attempt to use surrogates, explaining: "The victims disagree that Epstein can simply stand on the sidelines now and jump into the fray later. They will accordingly oppose any later — untimely — effort on his part to intervene in this suit. DE 78 at 4 n.2. Epstein first sought limited intervention back on September 2, 2011, when he moved to intervene with regard to correspondence between his attorneys and federal prosecutors. DE 93. I EFTA01081198