MOORE DODSON & RUSSELL, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 5035 (I4A) None Dade. Suite I Post Office Box 310, Si Thomas, V.1.00804-0310 'Boston E. Moore J. Daryl Dodson *Nissen, Jr. TelephoneM Facsimile e er September 11, 2012 VIA FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION & MAIL Denise Francois, Esquire Hodge & Francois 1340 Taarneberg St. Thomas. V.1.00802 (Fax No RE: EPSTEIN. et at v. FANCELLI PANELING. INC.. Dear Attorney Francois: ar tresmoore aol.com [email protected] sieve4Pindrvi.com My Associate, Michele Baker, just concluded a conversation with Mr. Fanelli and his French Attorney regarding your letter to me dated September 10. 2012. which we forwarded to them yesterday. Mr. Fancelli's comments pertaining to the discussion you referenced therein differs in several respects. called Mr. Fancelli speaking French, but he could hear someone in the background providing her with instructions in English. She was suggesting settlement without the participation of lawyers. He insisted on seeing the work in place first and the participation of his attorneys for purposes of settlement. She re uested a settlement number front him and he wanted to discuss it with his attorneys first. was having difficulty in providing her call back numbers in French and Mr. Fancelli told her in English to give the numbers in that language. At that juncture, Mr. Epstein took over the conversation, surprised that Mr. Fancelli spoke some English (Mr. Fancelli is more comfortable in conducting business in his best language, French). Mr. Epstein again suggested meeting without lawyers to talk settlement and Mr. Fancelli again reiterated the need to evaluate the work in place first and the need for his lawyers to participate in settlement discussions. Mr. Epstein said the work was now to his satisfaction, that there was nothing to see that was wrong and that he would send Mr. Fancelli the pictures reflecting this. Mr. Fancelli does not want pictures, he wants the work inspected and ev