From: "jeffrey E." <[email protected]> To: David Grosof Subject: Re: Your Special Day Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 13:04:00 +0000 god - so he does play , just not with fair dice On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 7:44 AM, David Grosof l> wrote: Is there something for central tendency that is like an inertial reference frame, from which a different abstract understanding of probability develops, one that's better for showing the kloodgey, apparent force nature to which you point? Please forgive typos. Sent from Android Nexus 6 phone. On Jan 20, 2017 4:32 AM, "jeffrey E." <[email protected]> wrote: yes , now assume that there i a balancing force. and gravity is merely the result of paticles being pushed together . etc On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 7:26 AM, David Grosof < > wrote: can't resist! Please forgive typos. Sent from Android Nexus 6 phone. On Jan 20, 2017 4:14 AM, "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]> wrote: probablity and statistics gets its strengh from the law of large numbers . centrifigal force is a pseudo force but not distinguishable in the right frame. . like gravity. lets assume that there is a force pushing heads and tails towards a 50 50 distribution. . not merely recording it. regression to the mean. etc. would . could be a force similar to the EM one. On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 7:11 AM, David Grosof < wrote: Cool. And the former question, of clarification? Please forgive typos. Sent from Android Nexus 6 phone. On Jan 20, 2017 4:10 AM, "jeffrey E." [email protected]> wrote: pretty well On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 7:02 AM, David Grosof > wrote: Probability as a force rather than a what? Didn't suss out the next word... Watson's pretty wild and fun, if overconfident about some ideas about autism when I saw him talk —4 years ago on book tour ®Google. I met him once through Gunther Stent, as well as Crick on another occasion. Know him well? D. Please forgive typos. Sent from Android Nexus 6 phone. On Jan 20, 2017 2:47 AM, "jeffrey