From: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]> To: Brad Wechsler < Subject: Re: Fw: Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2017 18:31:36 +0000 no- cannot say based on On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 1:41 PM, Brad Wechsler < > wrote: Jeffrey-the language PW feels they had from you read: "In essence the same information has been provided to the IRS by Apollo directly." I don't be- lieve they feel that is not fully accurate and therefore broadened the concept to say Apollo's filings and those today were "based on the same underlying tax information." If you feel that doesn't help make your point/inference we can delete the sentence and go back to the draft I circulated yesterday as "final". This seems to be the last open point. I'm amd if you want to talk. B Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry From: "jeffrey E." <[email protected]> Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2017 17:27:14 +0000 To: Brad Wechsler >; Leon Black< Subject: Re: Fw: It is NOT ABOUT NUMBERS On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 1:15 PM Brad Wechsler < Fyi Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry ---Original Message From: Date: The, 7 Feb 2017 17:15:11 To: John Suydam Reply-To: Cc: Leon Black John-the language we wld include wld be: "In addition, the information included on the Forms 8865 and 8858 filed by the appropriate Apollo entities was based on the same underlying tax information that is included on the applicable International Information Returns being filed today." I think accurate and pretty benign but please run your traps. Thx, brad Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry wrote: please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by ret