From: Noam Chomsky To: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]>, Valeria Chomsky Subject: Re: Marital Trust Date: Mon, 21 May 2018 19:32:43 +0000 Just wrote Harry, along the lines we discussed, and I added what you suggest here about attacking the will. All crazy. I'd like Harry to come straight out and say what Max attributes to him. I've asked several times, but no response yet. And may again if the occasion arises. On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 12:22 PM, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: once you get the proposed split. there are many mechanisms , releases etc. they will want you to have a lawyer so that they can protect against a future lawsuit based on not full understanding , it is common. FYI, according to max. harrys position is that carol would not have wanted her portion of the money to go to valeria. its a silly argument. . with releases from all , valeria you hany and your daughters anytihing is possible. . you will need to include an agreement not to attack your will. to protect valeria. On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 9:06 PM Noam Chomsky < wrote: I'll ask directly On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 11:26 AM, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: The elephant in the room is his sugested split On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 8:11 PM jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: Ok On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 8:09 PM Noam Chomsky < wrote: I'd like to hold off on this for a bit. I'm curious to learn more about Harry's thinking. I'd like to write to him saying that there's nothing in Mass law that prevents beneficiaries from doing as I suggested. He can relieve his concerns about future fiduciary responsibility by resigning, and we can return to the situation before I appointed him trustee, when I was trustee and had no concerns about fiduciary responsibility. If he feels that he has carried out past actions that make him liable to some legal process, he should arrange with his lawyer about ways to protect himself. I would also like to ask him more directly tha