From: "jeffrey E." <[email protected]> To: Noam Chomsky Subject: Re: Marital Trust Date: Mon, 21 May 2018 18:11:14 +0000 Ok On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 8:09 PM Noam Chomsky < > wrote: I'd like to hold off on this for a bit. I'm curious to learn more about Harry's thinking. I'd like to write to him saying that there's nothing in Mass law that prevents beneficiaries from doing as I suggested. He can relieve his concerns about future fiduciary responsibility by resigning, and we can return to the situation before I appointed him trustee, when I was trustee and had no concerns about fiduciary responsibility. If he feels that he has carried out past actions that make him liable to some legal process, he should arrange with his lawyer about ways to protect himself. I would also like to ask him more directly than before what he thinks would be a proper division. Then we can go on from there. OK? On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 2:03 AM, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: Rich Kahn can talk with Harry if ok with u On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 10:13 AM jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: All silly , they can make s final distribution of 2 million dollars and you and Valeria release all. Max Harry children and you receive releases - easy On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 6:46 AM Noam Chomsky < > wrote: the latest. Mass law prevents beneficiaries to divide up a trust and liquidate it? Forwarded message From: Harry Chomsky <[email protected]> Date: Sun, May 20, 2018 at 9:19 PM Subject: Re: Marital Trust To: Noam Cho Cc: Avi Chomsk , Diana Chomsky It sounds like you would like me to say yes or no to your proposal exactly as you have stated it, without further discussion. I can't do that. Here are some reasons: 1. It's not permitted under Massachusetts trust law. I agreed to certain obligations when I became trustee, and I have to make sure to discharge them faithfully. Even if you tell me you don't care about my fiduciary responsibility, the law says