From: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]> To: Lany <la Subject: Re: Gulfstream G550 SIN 5173 LOI Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 16:23:12 +0000 darren is writing an email for you to send On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 12:20 PM, Larry c wrote: Jeffrey and Darren Should I email Josh and ask for lighting strike data? Or phone call? What should I say to josh? Thx tarry You make mention of "No material damage History the repair of which would constitute a Major repair", During my visit to Oakland to view the aircraft, I arrived at 1pm in SFO and drive to OAK,. I had brief time to inspect the plane before Chevron closed the hanger doors at 4:30pm,. I was presented a mountain of log books to view,. During my viewing, which was brief, I didn't see a log book entry for Lighting or bird strike,.whether it was there, i couldn't say,. It took Westfield 5 days to review log book during ACRS PreBuy inspection. 4. Key aspects of the purchase agreement terms that are already listed in the LOI are the Delivery Condition (Paragraph 5B), which generally appears to be satisfactory, so long as we don't mind that airworthiness requirements are limited to airworthiness for operations under FAR Part 91, the corrosion condition is "no material corrosion beyond manufacturer's allowable limits", and the damage condition is "no material damage history, the repair of which could constitute a "major repair" as such termini defined in 17 CFR Part 43, Appendix A". So if we want to make sure we are comfortable with damage and corrosion we should inspect records during the initial inspection to determine what if any damage and corrosion there has been before we sign a purchase agreement. Sent from my iPad Begin forwarded message: From: Darren Indyke Date: January 26, 2017 at 12:07:14 PM EST To: Larry Visoski <S> Cc: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Richard Kahn < Subject: Re: Gulfstream G550 S/N 5173 LOI Overall, if you are really interested in the aircraft at a $ l6MM price