From: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]> To: "Barry J. Cohen" Subject: Re: FW: Leon Black - Purchase of G650 Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 13:39:21 +0000 an example barry is cosmetics. scratches on the wood . In tlIc glass racks. . stains in carpet , none relate to ariworthy On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Barry J. Cohen < > wrote: FYI From: Barry J. Cohen Sent: Tuesday, June 27. 2017 9:02 AM To: Tom Mitchell' Cc: Wimer, Ruth Subject: RE: Leon Black - Purchase of G650 ; Deyoe, David < >; Lee Rohde ; Ada Clapp < ; John Castrucci Understood. If "airworthy" is the typical provision, then this seems fine. !just wondered if there was a higher standard that is sometimes used in contracts. And you are saying that because we are requiring a 48-month inspection as a pre-condition to closing, we can live with a more basic pre-buy inspection, right? From: Tom Mitchell [mailto Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 8:58 AM To: Barry J. Cohen ; Deyoe, David < >; Lee Rohde Cc: Wimer, Ruth ; Ada Clapp < ; John Castrucci Subject: RE: Leon Black - Purchase of G650 Hi Barry, I can take a shot at these questions as others can chime in. EFTA01042310