From: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]> To: Valeria Chomsky Subject: Re: taxes Date: Sun, 02 Jul 2017 09:22:14 +0000 yes, the money in trust for them originally came from Noam correct? On Sun, Jul 2, 2017 at 12:48 AM, Valeria Chomsky > wrote: I) The money under discussion is all Noam's. All the other assets were transferred to Noam's children in trusts or directly. For example, the Wellfleet house became a LLC under their names. 2) Carol had been working earlier. But almost all the money was from Noam's income and there were no distinction between the two income flows. Valeria Forwarded message From: jeffrey E. [email protected]> Date: Sat, Jul 1, 2017 at 11:55 PM Subject: Re: taxes To: Valeria Chomsky I personally will meet with speak with any one or all of them. so put your mind at ease. they are right in certain regards. however it tells me little re the overall situation. The interest language is ok. it was designed to merely pass through the same amount that the trust was paying , as they were borrowing the money themselves from pershing. and you were only required to pay the same rate that they were paying. . however I have many questions re the overall. . we can rectify this fairly quickly . but I want to make sure we have all the documents first. 1 did the children EARN any of the money under discussion or is this all noams. 2 did his past wife earn this money. ? I suggest you tell them that you wish to collect all documents in one place. and then the moment that is complete you will have someone sit with them. . dont let on its me. . tell them as soon as you have all the does you will straighten this all out. . On Sat, Jul 1, 2017 at 9:13 PM, Valeria Chomsky > wrote: Jeffrey, We just received the following letter. Noam would like if you could take a look at this letter and let us know if it is accurate or not on the interpretation of the promissory note. And if not, could you please explain why it is not? Valeria --