From: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]> To: Valeria Chomsky Subject: Re: FW: MIT Agreement - Final Date: Sat, 01 Jul 2017 15:39:48 +0000 does not make sense to me. yet. I would like to see the note to the trust. . ask for an accounting of all trust assets. fees distributions since carols death. . the house woudl have been transfered to noam ESTATE tax free. had it simply been transfered directly, not sure why it went into a trust. / the promissiory note is important. as are the assets of the trust. BTW this is the usual ( unfortuately , ) the money to buy the lexington house was it noams money did carol earn money, did the kids contribute etc. how long after carol transferred the house did she die. ? they talk about substantail tax savings. what are they? amount. . etc On Sat, Jul 1, 2017 at 11:33 AM, Valeria Chomsky < > wrote: The lawyer's memo about the loan is attached to the e-mail with the subject "Taxes" and interspersed with Noam's comments in bold letters. Did you receive it? Valeria Forwarded message From: Jeffrey E leevacation®gmail.com> Date: Sat, Jul 1, 2017 at 11:21 AM Subject: Re: FW: MIT Agreement - Final To: Valeria Chomsky send me the lawyer letter On Sat, Jul 1, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Valeria Chomsky < > wrote: Yes, there is, with many pages. Not sure if we have it. I'll request the copy. Here is the answer for one of your questions yesterday to Noam about the archives agreement with MIT. "For avoidance of doubt, this is a donation of the physical materials only, not of the copyright or any other intellectual property rights in the Donated Materials. I or my assignees expressly retain all right, title and interest in all intellectual property rights, including copyrights, in the Donated Materials (whether published or unpublished). I may assign. license or transfer any or all of the intellectual property rights in the Donated Materials at my sole discretion and I and my assigns, heirs, and designees shall enjoy all in