Sent from my iPhone From: Lawrence Krauss <I To: Justin Dillon <1 Cc: nancy dahl Subject: Re: Krauss settlement agreement - revised draft Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 13:15:40 +0000 Thanks. Will look at this again. Lawrence M. Krauss Professor Arizona State University, . Box 871404 Tempe, AZ 85287-1404 School of Earth & Space Ex loration and Physics Department Research Office: 480.965.6378, Assistant (Jessica): 480.965.9825 krauss.facultv.asu.edu On Oct 15, 2018, at 5:40 AM, Justin Dillon < > wrote: I think maybe we just disagree about what you should do here. I think you go too into the weeds; all of the lettered rehashing reads to me as the desperate, dying last gasp, rather than a serious indictment of their process. I think it dramatically undermines the effectiveness of the letter. But that's your call, of course; this is your resignation letter. The highlighting and bolding was my indication of the parts I found most dangerous and that I thought ran the most risk of having you violate the agreement. The highlighting was "dangerous," and the bolding was "very dangerous." Again, it's entirely your call how you want to go out—if you want to rehash what I think are minor points (we left them out of the appeal for a reason) or reargue points we did argue in the appeal, then you can do that. Same goes for risking disparagement by keeping in the harshest language. But I think the letter will be more effective if it's a tighter discussion of the overall process, and not a relitigation of all the bad things they did, and I would hate to see all of this hard work on settlement go out the window if Crow says you disparaged ASU. Justin Dillon KaiserDillon PLLC 1401 K Street NW Suite 600 Washington, DC 20005 (2021640-4427 On Oct 14, 2018, at 11:49 PM, Lawrence Krauss < > wrote: Here is my basic reworking of yours.. The OEI paragraph is now short, and Erin herself is not mentioned explicitly. I did include the other list as I say, because no