From: J <[email protected]> To: Lawrence Krauss Subject: Re: a possible consult with Ms. Martin Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 10:10:36 +0000 as you recall it was me that told you , you shoudl not be on campus. and notify them . your grieveance is the treatment. sending your stuff back prematurely.. not being allowed to test the credibioity of your alleged acuusers unless you agreed to be dismissed vs retire. they gave you a hobson choice and you could not financailly accept. lawyers would have cost 100k out of your own pocket , to question your accusers. OUTRAGEOUS.. you should lay out , i was accused of showing a 3rd grade cartoon. and told i could retire or be dismissed and hire lawyers to cross examine people , after the dismissal letter , risk retrinnenent benefits. etc. university policy says leave with pay can not extend past certain number of days. the say you agreed to it anyway. . making it a contractual agreement rather than policy. the fact that the dean said she did not agree with your charactierization of what she said is one more example of you making uncessarty statements that work against you. . On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 7:51 PM Lawrence Krauss wrote: Thanks.. btw.. I don't want to blow this.. I figured it would be good to touch base with the Phoenix lawyer that Jim mentioned, as this law firm has sued ASU in the past. Lawrence M. Krauss Professor School of Earth & Space Exploration and Physics Department Arizona State University, Research Office: Assistant (Jessica): On Nov 14, 2018, at 4:42 PM, J <[email protected]> wrote: You are on very weak ground . With this part . Very On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 7:32 PM Lawrence Krauss wrote: Dear Ms. Martin: I left a brief phone message, but this will flesh this out. I am a professor at ASU, and recently completed an employment review process responding to various allegations of conduct that ended in a conciliation process. I will retire from the University on approximately my 65th