From: "jeffrey E." <[email protected]> To: "Farkas, Andrew L." Subject: Re: What did you think? Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 22:01:40 +0000 sorry i can't be there, grab an ass for me ( female please ) On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Farkas, Andrew L. < > wrote: My strategy around this is a little different. I'll call you tomorrow to explain and see if it changes your perspective. I'm on my way to my birthday party. Xoxo From: Jeffrey E. [mailto:jeevacSg i mail O3M Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2014 05:58 PM To: Farkas, Andrew L Subject: Re: What did you think? i think the proposal is good but lacks the critical issues regarding taxation . an excahgne of property, ( bitcoin) said NOT to be a currency by the irs. has many strange laws. a bitcoin exchange is not viable , I belive unless regualtions come first. why is it not gambling, maybe it should be,? barter, ? rules are vague, options security laws . currency the cate gory that it is not. also has unique issues, Definitions first , not along the way , would be my reccomendation. On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 3:34 PM, Farkas, Andrew L. < > wrote: This message, and any attachments hereto, is confidential and intended exclusively for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. This communication may contain information that is confidential, proprietary, privileged, subject to a confidentiality and/or non-disclosure agreement, or otherwise exempt or protected from disclosure (either by contract or under applicable law). If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that printing, retaining, reproducing, copying, disclosing, disseminating or using this message or any information contained herein (including any reliance thereon) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender immediately and destroy the message (including any attachments) and any copies in their entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. Nothing cont